The Guardian
topics

Publishers Beware: Advani Ads Can Look Like You Are Endorsing Him

image
If you are a web publisher who uses Google AdSense to serve up ads on your websites, you might want to have a good look at the image ads from the “LK Advani For PM” campaign served up on your website by Google (NSDQ: GOOG). As in the screenshots here, these image ads can look like an endorsement from the site in the absense of the ‘Ads by Google’ tag.

Advani is the prime ministerial candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party, which has taken big time to camapaigning online through a website, blog and heavyduty online advertising through Google AdSense, in a much talked about initiative. The strategy is believed to be inspired by US President Barack Obama’s success mobilizing support online during his campaign and the fact that some 40% of voters in the upcoming general elections are below 25 years of age. A delimitation exercise also means that urban voters, who are more likely to be netizens than their rural counterparts thanks to poor Internet penetration, will have greater representation this time.

While we were reading through Outlook‘s website last week, we stumbled upon a large banner ad at the bottom of the page, which starkly said “Advani For PM’. We brought it to the notice of Outlook publisher Maheshwar Peri that in the absense of the ‘Ads by Google’ tag or any other demarcation by the publisher, it can seem at least to some readers, that Outlook is endorsing Advani. Over the years, Outlook‘s editorial stance has been opposed to Advani’s Hindutva rhetoric, making this a possibility that the magazine, or any independent news outlet for that matter, wouldn’t want to risk. Peri agreed with us and immediately got his people to look into the matter. “We make sure that ads are separated from edit. We will ensure that it is done,” he told us. Now the magazine has decided to insert an image by the side of the ad, clearly specifying that this is an advertisement.

image
The fact is, Peri, or the folks at Outlook, couldn’t have seen this coming. If you are signing up for AdSense and wanted to understand how an image ad would look like, Google would show you the samples on this page, where all ad formats—text, image and video—clearly carry a line on it saying ‘Ads by Google’. If the Advani campaign signed up as an Ad Words user, they would have been shown the same page as samples of how their ads would appear.

So then how come the Advani ads don’t carry that tag? Is there a different adsense package an advertiser can use to remove the Ads by Google disclaimer? And did the Advani campaign use that?

We asked Sushil Pandit, who heads up The Hive, an advertising agency that is handling the campaign. He said it was never something that was discussed. When we asked him if he could say that the Advani camaign did not insist on removing the ‘Ads by Google’ tag from its ads, he didn’t, and asked us what we were tyring to get at. “When i’m telling you this was never a matter that we discussed, where is the question of insisting?” he asked. We also put the question to Prodyut Bora, who heads BJP’s information technology cell that handles the online campaign, and he said this has never been brought to his attention.

We asked Google when does an ad say it is by Google and when doesn’t it say that. Despite repeated attempts, we did not receive a response, though a Google spokesperson did send us a link to Google AdSense Program Policies, which has no answers to the question.

It’s possible that Google allows premium advertisers to hide the ‘Ads by Google’ tag. But if you are a publisher, you would not know it looking at the pages laying down the policies of the AdSense program. And as the case of Outlook demonstrates, you can be caught unawares.

When the seperation of editorial content and advertising in a newspaper is so sacrosanct, it shouldn’t be any different for a publication’s online edition.

Mar 18, 2009 3:30 AM ET
Share

Posted In:

  • kk dixit

    Rashtriya viklang party is the only one political party which is working for handicapped founded before 40 months by its prisedent K.K dixit.At present rvp is working in UP,MP,CHHATTISGARH.JHARKHAND,BIHAR.RAJASTHAN.DELHI.MAHARASTRA,HP, WITH 65 LAKHS DEDICATED MEMBERS.
    Main aim of rvp is let to join handicapped to main stream of indian democracy & to participate in government.according to rvp survey there are 6000 handicapped voters in every vidhan sabha constetwencies.It means all handicapped able to be kingmaker.It is very good to rvp that all the handicapped accepted to rvp their own party & leader to k.k dixit.If your party wants to do something for handicapped then rvp can make a difference of 10 to 25 thousant votes on every seats.If your party invite to rvp on a election convecing it is with u.

    Thanx & regards

    K.K Dixit
    National president
    Rashtriya viklang party
    9891490154.9839893380,9213173860

  • Mr X

    @ Sruthijith KK
    Two things that came out..
    Quoting your main post "Outlook‘s editorial stance has been opposed to Advani’s Hindutva rhetoric" , it would have looked better if you had written "Outlook's pro-congress rabidly anti-Hindu editorial stance"
    Quoting your reply to some comments "that’s the danger we are trying to point out."  What's/where's the danger? Is it Advani/BJP/the ad? Or is it the danger of Outlook readers getting hoodwinked by the ad?
    Come on man… give us a break. You are just making an issue out of non-issue. Maybe you should leave contentsutra and join India TV or Aajtak.

  • Srinath

    @ Ankita

    One would expect a reporter to understand what it is they're writing about.

    @ author

    Geez… sensationalistic headlines.. but article full of fluff. As one of the other guys said, I doubt you'd have said that had it been amma's promotional banner

  • I think we r being a little harsh on d writer.

    Why r we limiting the website/blog readers to ppl who understand ad sense,google,ad words etc.

    Most populace who is on the internet DO NOT know about these. People who read blogs/websites on bollywood,heatlh,fashion etc mite not realize that these are advertisements.

    They mite actually think the blog/website is promoting BJP.

    For eg,If my mom reads her frnds blog who is a congress follwoer will get annoyed on her frnd for having BJP banners on her blog.

    @deleteComment for god sake dont over estimate the readers

  • DeleteComment

    This is for Peri
    When they publish ads in Outlook magazine do they carry a tag which says Ads By Outlook?
    For god sake, don't underestimate your readers. They can differentiate an Advani For PM ad with your editorial content!
    PS: This Breaking News Story [You Are Reading It Here First] should have been filed under Much Ado About Nothing! Guess, even Nikhil would agree on that.

  • MonkeyMan

    Looks like you filed the story in a real hurry! Too many spelling mistakes too!! And seriously, leave the digital to Niks. Focus on your core competencies.. sigh!

  • alok

    I saw the image. It nowhere looks like that Outlook is endorsing LKA or BJP. It seems you just made an issue out of nothing.

  • DeleteComment

    Good that you have deleted the first comment.
    Now would you please concentrate on the Print media and leave the digital to Nikhil.
    Just take it from the comments posted above that you don't understand digital.

  • Dhananjay

    Sounds like Sour Grapes :-)

    I am sure you would not have written this article if it were an Ad showing Manmohan SIngh or Sonia / Rahul Gandhi !!

  • Rajesh R K

    @Sruthijith

    I was just pulling your leg there.

    But what I fail to understand is how is the LKA campaign different from a Nokia or a Kamasutra. If you saw a Nokia flash ad on Outlook - would you think that Outlook suggests that its users use Nokia (or KS as the case may be). Why dosent Outlook ad a tab saying that those are ads (in those cases).  Why does it take an LKP/BJP to make everyone sit and take notice. We have media houses taking up Private Treaties as if its the second coming of Christ - and no one cares about it! Now cant you guys dig some dirt out on how these PT's are being misused?

    GOOG has a wonderful system through which any campaign can be blocked by a publisher - so its not a matter of Peri asking his people to look into it.

    And anyways - guess you would agree that this is pretty much a non issue.

  • That's just like an amateur post on anything digital,  back during nikhil's days contentsutra was meant to be a barometer of digital media now all i see is just print media and occasionally u write on digital then u do on such stupid things as an Advani ad

  • Thanks Rajesh. I understand the point about Flash Ads. That's why i linked to another picture (of the blog) which has an image ad. Advani campaign has text, image and flash ads and except for text ads, it doesn't appear anywhere. I'm by no means suggesting there is any evil conspiracy here. Just that if news outlets (or any publishers) are told by google that there will always be a disclaimer, there should be. second, publishers must be more careful to seperate edit and ad on their online properties as well.

    There are many instances when a media company is running a campaign, and on their site, they will have a banner saying something like 'save ridley turtles' (for eg), which is a cause the media company believes in and if a google ad code is served next to it, the image alongside can potentially say 'advani for pm'. that's the danger we are trying to point out.

  • Lord Haw Haw

    just block the man's mug. which is what almost every news site has already done…

    quite a non-issue.

  • Rajesh R K

    Well,

    GOOG does put in the Ads By Google on text ad units and compresses image banners to do it (for image ads). But flash ads are left alone by GOOG (and NO! this does not signify any evil tie up between GOOG and the BJP/LKA).

    You really haven't been observing ads much if this is the first ad that you noticed (served by GOOG) which did not have the Ads By Google tag. None of the flash ads will have the tag.

    I do appreciate the work you guys do - and I find your writing analytical and to the point - but this is much ado about nothing! Just hope this dosent make the Outlook cover next week.

    Rajesh

  • While its common for large publishers to feature Ads without the Ads by Google disclaimer. Since lot of Ads are evaluated by automated systems before going live on the network I feel they have that disclaimer. For Ads with large budgets a manual review might be done to give that special status. Not debating much on that…

    The political nature of this AD makes it eye catchy and we stat to think of this endorsement thing. But the fact remain that most Ads are made such that the audience of the particular site take it as a recommendation from that publisher.

    Just as I type this I can see Ads from Nokia and Sony on my blog without that Ads by google disclaimer :)

India’s Digital News Monitor | contentSutra Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Contributors